Attack was engineered to keep the skeptics in disarray.
Ongoing interference fans conflicts.
- vagueness and contradictions in official story
- large variations in timeline
- the evidence vacuum
- changing stories -- the story of F93
- did flights 11 and 77 fly? (not in NTSB records)
An ill-defined target is harder to attack.
- complexity of attack
- 'hijackings'
- military-non-response
- WTC hits
- pentagon hit -- jetliner, followed by C130, KC-135 over DC
- pentagon collapse
- WTC collapses
- B7 collapse
Complexity creates divisive disagreements.
People have different standards for evaluating evidence.
- audicity and technical difficulty of attack
People in government would never do anythign so evil
What happened to Flight 77?
How were the towers rigged with explosives without notice?
- bracketing the truth
Distractions from the truth by going not far enough and too far.
- limited hangout
The Saudis did it.
limit hangouts avoid all of:
- stand-down
- remote control
- Pentagon frame-up
- building demolitions
- unlimited hangover
The tower collissions were faked.
Core attack issues -- building demolitions --
are associated with crazy-sounding ideas.
|