Why Have Otherwise Critically Thinking People Endorsed CIT?

* Compelling Pentagon eyewitness interviews

• First-hand, extended
• On-site
• Appearance of thoroughness and validity

* Appearance of genuine grass-roots effort

• "Citizen's Investigation Team" -- just 2 guys
• Straightforward, unembellished productions

* Makes mythical event seem tangible and real

• Existing witness accounts were maligned, dismissed, ignored
• First-ever extended video interviews fills void
• Appears to validate years-old myth of witness complicity

* Highly confident language asserting claims as fact

• Assertions of objectivity
• Honed marketing language