Unacceptable for Witness to Question CIT

Keith Wheelhouse is a witness interviewed by CIT who places the plane to the south of the Citgo station

That contradicts CIT's northside flyover theory and is unacceptable to CIT:

There is really nothing more to discuss unless you want to confess, Kieth. We now believe there was a "second plane" cover story employed utilizing ambiguity to cover up for the attack jet flying away. Your role in this mess was accurately predicted. We know the plane did not hit the building, Kieth. We know it was a flyover/flyaway. We have witnesses who prove this.

The question is, did you see the flyover and were coerced/prompted to say that the plane you saw flying away was a C-130 or are you a complicit operative put out there to help sow the confusion of the "second" plane story which, partly thanks to you, slowly is eventually confirmed as a C-130. We prefer to believe you are innocent and were coerced to lie.

Either way, things will work out better for you if you are honest. The video proves you are not telling the truth, Keith.

Citizen Investigation Team

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?action=profile%3Bu=1023%3Bsa=showPosts